Gender Specific Marketing – Does it Need to Stop?

Have you ever walked into a department store and wondered why the toy section for girls is filled with dolls, pink Easy Bake Ovens and toy make-up kits while boys have a section filled with action figures, blue sports equipment, and toy guns? Well, you won’t find that at Harrod’s Department Store in London, which is taking a new marketing approach to selling toys. Instead of the typical gender specific sections found in most toy stores, they created a “Toy Kingdom” where toys are organized by their own “worlds” such as circus and tree-top. By doing this, they have opened the door for praise and criticism.

For some, this is the exact change that is needed for kids to make their own decisions on what types of toys they want to play with instead of older generations deciding for them.

“Kids get a lot of ideas early from play about what they can do, what they like and what they can aspire to,” said Deborah Tolman, co-founder of SPARK, a girl-fueled activist movement to end to the sexualization of women and girls in media. “By making those themes gender specific, it leaves out a whole range of possibilities.”

Lego received a lot of heat this past winter for “Lego Friends” their new toy line for girls with Lego colors changed from the original red, green and blue blocks to pale greens, pinks, and purples and offering kits to make Lego vets or ice cream shops. Although there was a lot of backlash, many marketing experts called Lego’s marketing strategy smart.

“Segmentation is the key to marketing and the further you mine into the segmentation the stronger your message will resonate with the audience,” says Emily Spensieri of advertising firm Quiller and Blake/FEM.

Also, researchers have found that children have an inherent preference for certain types of toys that is demonstrated as early on as infancy. Girls like “girls toys” before they realize that they are girls. A 2008 study of rhesus monkeys found that the males preferred trucks to dolls.

Regardless of whether it is smart to market toys based on gender or if toy preference is an innate choice, it may have a negative effect on a child’s identity when companies predetermine what their interests should be through marketing strategies.

Lisa Serbin, research chair in human development and professor of psychology at Montreal’s Concordia University, says that the problem with targeting toys is that “it reinforces the stereotypes and reinforces the separation of play groups. You’re not expanding their horizons or encouraging them to try something new. Do we really want to limit girls to things that are colored pink? To me that’s bizarre.”

Harrod’s is not the only store that is changing the way it displays its merchandise. Toy Et. Cetera also markets its toys based on types of activities rather than gender, with an increasing numbers of independent toy stores doing the same. So, should this trend that should continue or are we being too sensitive to the impact that gender specific marketing can have on kids?

Do you think gender specific marketing has an adverse effect on girls’ and boys’ identities?

Do kids learn at an early age what toys are “gender appropriate” or is it an innate characteristic in both boys and girls?

What role does toy choice for boys and girls have on childhood bullying?

Posted on September 19, 2012, in Real Discussions and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: